[Laparoscopic excision versus open excision for the treatment of choledochal cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis]. / Laparoskopicheskoe i otkrytoe khirurgicheskoe lechenie kist kholedokha: sistematicheskii obzor i metaanaliz.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if laparoscopic excision is more effective than open excision in the treatment of choledochal cysts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials in 3 databases measuring the efficacy of laparoscopic and open excision of choledochal cysts was performed. The authors considered international and national reports, whose results were analyzed in detail. RESULTS: Mean duration of laparoscopic excision was 51 min, open excision - 35.4 min. Length of hospital-stay after laparoscopic excision ranged between 5 and 74 days, after open excision - between 7 and 146 days. Bile leakage rate was 1-2% and 4%, respectively. Laparoscopic excision was followed by lower complication rate. Morbidity and mortality in laparoscopic excision was 20% and 0%, in open excision - 60% and 3.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic excision is more effective than open excision in the treatment of choledochal cysts.

The advantages of duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in pediatric living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Whether Roux-en-Y hepatic jejunectomy (HJ) or duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction (DD) is more useful in pediatric living donor liver transplantation has not yet been fully investigated. Therefore, to assess the feasibility and safety of DD, we compared the surgical outcomes of DD to HJ. METHODS: We divided 45 patients, excluding those with biliary atresia, into the DD group (n = 20) and the HJ group (n = 25), according to the type of biliary reconstruction they received. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rates (DD vs. HJ = 79.7% vs. 83.6%, p = 0.70) and the incidence of biliary complications, including bile leakage and stricture (DD vs. HJ = 1 [5.0%] vs. 1 [4.0%], p = 0.87) were not significantly different between the groups. However, intestinal complications, including bowel perforation or ileus, were significantly common in the HJ group (9/25 [36.0%]) than in the DD group (1/20 [5.0%]; p = 0.01). The three patients in the HJ group with intestinal perforation all suffered perforation at the anastomosed site in the Roux-en-Y procedure. The subgroup analysis showed the non-inferiority of DD to HJ for biliary or intestinal complications in patients weighting < 10 kg. CONCLUSION: With a proper selection of cases, DD should be a safe method for biliary reconstruction in pediatric recipients with little risk of biliary complications equivalent to HJ and a reduced risk of intestinal complications.

Instructional Video For Hepaticojejunostomy Anastomosis Ensuring Evenly Spaced Sutures.

OBJECTIVE: We demonstrate a surgical technique involving construction of a hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) anastomosis that ensures even spacing between the sutures regardless of the size of the common bile duct. This is demonstrated via a series of illustrations followed by live demonstration of a HJ anastomosis created during a Whipple procedure. VIDEO DESCRIPTION: Overall, this technique results in the creation of a tension-free hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis, that typically does not require stenting, is highly reliable and replicable regardless of the size of the common bile duct. It is also easily reproducible and easy to teach trainees.

Development and validation of a hybrid simulator for ultrasound-guided laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is the surgical management of choledocholithiasis. The procedure presents significant benefits to patients but still fails to be generalised because of the complex set of skills it requires. A simulator for ultrasound-guided LCBDE would allow trainee surgeons as well as experienced surgeons who perform this surgery seldomly to practice and gain confidence. METHODS: This article presents the development and validation of an easily reproducible hybrid simulator for ultrasound-guided LCBDE which integrates real and virtual components of the task. We first developed a physical model made of silicone. The fabrication technique is replicable and allows quick and easy production of multiple models. We then applied virtual components onto the model to create training for laparoscopic ultrasound examination. Combined with a commercially available lap-trainer and surgical equipment, the model can be used for training the fundamental steps of the surgery through the trans-cystic or trans-choledochal approaches. The simulator was evaluated through face, content, and construct validation. RESULTS: Two novices, eight middle grades, and three experts were recruited to test the simulator. The results of the face validation showed that the surgeons found the model realistic visually and felt realistic when performing the different steps of the surgery. The content validation indicated the usefulness of having a training system to practice the choledochotomy, the choledochoscopy and stone retrieval, and the suturing. The construct validation highlighted the ability of the simulator to differentiate between surgeons with various levels of expertise. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid simulator presented is a low-cost yet realistic model which allows the surgeons to practice the technical skills required for trans-cystic and trans-choledochal ultrasound-guided LCBDE.

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Patients with a Previous History of Biliary Tract Surgery.

For recurrent choledocholithiasis, abdominal adhesions in previous surgeries lead to changes in anatomical structures, and a secondary injury occurs easily when performing another operation for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), which was once considered a relative contraindication. In view of the limitations of the current surgical technique, this study summarized the surgical approaches and crucial anatomical landmarks for reoperation for LCBDE. Four general surgical approaches were proposed to expose the common bile duct, including the ligamentum teres hepatis approach, the anterior hepatic duodenal ligament approach, the right hepatic duodenal ligament approach, and the hybrid approach. Additionally, this study highlighted seven crucial anatomical landmarks: the parietal peritoneum, the gastrointestinal serosa, the ligamentum teres hepatis, the inferior margin of the liver, the gastric antrum, the duodenum, and the hepatic flexure of the colon, which were helpful to safely separate abdominal adhesions and expose the common bile duct. Moreover, to shorten the time of choledocholithotomy, a sequential method was innovatively applied for the removal of the stones in common bile duct. Mastering the above surgical approaches, including identifying crucial anatomical landmarks and adopting the sequential method will improve the safety of reoperation for LCBDE, shorten the operation time, promote the fast recovery of patients, reduce postoperative complications, and contribute to the popularization and application of this technique.

Biodegradable biliary stents coated with mesenchymal stromal cells in a porcine choledochojejunostomy model.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Roux en y anastomosis is a preferred method of biliary reconstruction in liver transplantation that involves living donors or pediatric patients. However, biliary stricture is a frequent and serious complication, accounting for up to 40% of biliary complications in these patients. Previously, we demonstrated that extraluminal delivery of adipose-derived (AD) mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) decreased peri-biliary fibrosis and increased neo-angiogenesis in a porcine model of duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis. In this study, we used a porcine model of Roux en y anastomosis to evaluate the beneficial impact of a novel intraluminal MSC delivery system. METHODS: Nine animals were divided into three groups: no stent (group 1), bare stent (group 2) and stent coated with AD-MSCs (group 3). All animals underwent cholecystectomy with roux en y choledochojejunostomy. Two animals per group were followed for 4 weeks and one animal per group was followed for 8 weeks. Cholangiograms and blood were sampled at baseline and the end of study. Biliary tissue was collected and examined by Masson trichrome staining and immunohistochemical staining for MSC markers (CD34 and CD44) and for neo-angiogenesis (CD31). RESULTS: Two of three animals in group 1 developed an anastomotic site stricture. No strictures were observed in the animals of group 2 or group 3. CD34 and CD44 staining showed that AD-MSCs engrafted successfully at the anastomotic site by intraluminal delivery (group 3). Furthermore, biliary tissue from group 3 showed significantly less fibrosis and increased angiogenesis compared with the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intraluminal delivery of AD-MSCs resulted in successful biliary engraftment of AD-MSCs as well as reduced peri-biliary fibrosis and increased neo-angiogenesis.

Complications of biliary stenting versus T-tube insertion after common bile duct exploration: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Complications following the insertion T-tube or stent after common bile duct exploration (CBDE) remain problematic in nowadays surgical era. Based on our knowledge, we did not find any meta-analysis intentionally evaluating the complications between both groups. At this moment, we aimed to analyze and compare both procedures' complications, efficacy, efficiency, and feasibility. METHODS: We searched literature from four databases (EuroPMC, PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov) up to June 2022 to compile the randomized controlled trials and pro-/retrospective cohort studies. Review Manager 5.4 was used to statistically analyze each outcome measured between biliary stenting and T-tube insertion. RESULTS: Sixteen studies with 1,080 patients (534 biliary stents and 546 T-tube) were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis. The pooled risk ratio (RR) of the overall postoperative complications rate was significantly lower in the biliary stent group compared to the T-tube group 0.43 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23-0.80, p = 0.007]. In terms of the operation time, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate was also decreased in stenting as biliary drainage over T-tube placement 1.02 minutes [95% CI -1.53, -0.52, p < 0.0001], 1.96 days [95% CI -2.63, -1.29, p < 0.00001], and RR 0.39 [95% CI 0.15-0.97, p = 0.04], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Stenting as biliary drainage after CBDE was superior to T-tube insertion. A shorter operation time and hospital stay in biliary drainage resulted in a lower overall postoperative complication rate. Other influences, including the complexity and shorter learning curve, might also affect the superiority of biliary stenting.

Novel drill dilator facilitates endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy.

Tract dilation is one of the most difficult stages of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), especially for beginners. To overcome this problem, we applied a special dedicated dilator. Herein, we retrospectively evaluate the safety and usefulness of a novel drill dilator in EUS-HGS. This single-center retrospective study included 20 consecutive patients who underwent EUS-HGS with a novel drill dilator. The tip is 0.77 mm, and it becomes 7F at 3 cm from tip. The track is dilated to 7F by simple clockwise rotation. The technical success rate of both initial tract dilation and stent placement was 20/20 (100%). No cases required additional dilation such as balloon or electric cautery. In 13/20 cases (65.0%), EUS-HGS was performed by beginner endoscopists. Median time required for dilation was 62.5 s (range, 30-144 s). Median procedure time was 13 min (range, 7-25 min). Early adverse events were two cases of mild fever. There was no bile leakage or bleeding. The novel drill dilator appears to be safe and useful for EUS-HGS. As it is not necessary to press the device strongly, there is no pushback during dilation and the scope position is stable. These characteristics facilitate EUS-HGS even for beginners. This device may enable the further development and increased dissemination of EUS intervention.

Efficacy of robot-assisted hepaticojejunostomy and laparoscopic-assisted hepaticojejunostomy in pediatric congenital choledochal dilatation: a system review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The efficacy of robot-assisted hepaticojejunostomy (RAHJ) and laparoscopic-assisted hepaticojejunostomy (LAHJ) in children with congenital choledochal dilatation has been a topic of much debate and controversy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of RAHJ and LAHJ in pediatric congenital choledochal dilatation. METHOD: The review program has been prospectively registered (PROSPEROID: CRD42022306868). We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CBM, VIP, Web of Science, CNKI databases, and Wanfang databases from March 2021. The Mantel-Haenszel method and a random-effects model were used to figure out the hazard ratio (95% CI). RESULTS: Ten studies evaluated eight hundred and sixty-nine subjects (three hundred and thirty-two in the robotic group and five hundred and thirty-seven in the laparoscopic group), meeting all inclusion criteria. Compared with the laparoscopic group, robotic group demonstrated fewer postoperative complications [p = 0.0009; OR = 0.34 (95% CI, 0.18-0.64); I2 = 3%], shorter postoperative hospital stay [p < 00,001; MD = - 2.05 (95% CI, - 2.40-1.70); I2 = 0%], and less intraoperative bleeding [p = 0.008; MD = - 10.80 (95% CI, - 18.80-2.81); I2 = 99%]. There was no significant difference in operative time between the two groups [p = 0.10; MD = 24.53 (95% CI, - 5.11-54.17); I2 = 99%]. The same situation happened in short-term complication outcomes [p = 0.06; RR = 0.45 (95% CI, 0.19-1.04); I2 = 0%]. However, children in the RAHJ group had significantly lower levels of long-term complications [p = 0.04; OR = 0.41 (95% CI, 0.17-0.96); I2 = 0%]. Hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the RAHJ group [p < 0.00001; OR = 27,113.86 (95% CI, 26,307.24-27,920.48); I2 = 0%]. For overall complications, subgroup analysis of literature published after 2020 and of literature with high quality scores showed a significant decrease in the RAHJ group. CONCLUSION: In children with congenital choledochal dilatation, RAHJ is associated with reduced intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, and length of stay. Robotic surgery has a bright future in the treatment of pediatric common hepatic duct cysts and deserves to be promoted and popularized.

IS THE ANATOMICAL SEQUENCE OF GASTRIC AND BILIARY ANASTOMOSIS IN THE PANCREATODUODENECTOMY RECONSTRUCTION THE CAUSE OF AN INCREASE IN THE INCIDENCE OF CHOLANGITIS? A TECHNICAL VARIANT PRESENTATION AND INITIAL RESULTS.

BACKGROUND: Several methods have been proposed for the reconstruction of digestive transit after pancreatoduodenectomy. Biliary anastomosis positioned before gastric anastomosis helps reduce postoperative reflux and cholangitis. AIMS: The objective of this study was to present the anatomical sequence of gastric and biliary continuity after pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic tumor and to evaluate the short- and long-term results in an initial series of cases. METHODS: Two techniques were used: one with Roux-en-Y reconstruction and pancreaticojejunostomy and the other with a single jejunal loop and pancreatogastroanastomosis. In both the cases, the gastric anastomosis was placed performed before the biliary one. An analysis of demographic data, Wirsung's duct and common bile duct dilatation, the use of percutaneous drainage, and postoperative complications was carried out. RESULTS: A total of seven patients (four men and three women), with a mean age of 62 years, underwent surgery. All cases had Wirsung's duct and common bile duct dilatation. A percutaneous external biliary drainage was performed in four patients. There were three postoperative complications: one related to delayed gastric emptying and two related to wound infections. During a median follow-up of 12 months, no episode of cholangitis was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated percentages of cholangitis are reported in different reconstructions after pancreatoduodenectomy, and it is difficult to conclude reflux as the main etiology. The proposed gastric and biliary reconstructions show conforming results, facilitating posterior endoscopic access. Late follow-up and large number of cases may help assess whether the etiology of postoperative cholangitis is reflux or other factors unrelated to the order of the anastomoses.

The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic approach for the management of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones in patients with prior biliary tract surgical interventions.

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open reoperation for intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones patients with previous biliary tract surgical procedures. The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones patients with previous biliary tract surgical procedures who underwent reoperation in the Second General Surgery Department of China Medical University from January 2012 to February 2018. 44 eligible cases were selected. In accordance with the surgical procedures, they were divided into a laparoscopy group (n = 23) and an open surgery group (n = 21). No statistically significant differences were found in the preoperative general clinical data between the two group. Two patients in the laparoscopy group were converted to open surgery. Comparisons between the two groups showed that the intraoperative blood loss [90.87 ± 62.95 (ml) vs. 152.38 ± 118.82 (ml)], the proportion of postoperative analgesia [10/23 (43.5%) vs. 16/21 (76.2%)], and the length of stay [7.19 ± 5.32 (d) vs. 11.00 ± 4.66 (d)] in the laparoscopy group were significantly lower than those in the open surgery group (P < 0.05). Laparoscopic biliary reoperation for intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones was feasible. Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery has the advantages of less bleeding, a shorter postoperative length of stay, and a lower rate of additional postoperative analgesia.

Continuous or interrupted suture technique for hepaticojejunostomy during pancreatoduodenectomy (HEKTIK trial): study protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Hepaticojejunostomy is commonly performed in hepato-bilio-pancreatic surgery, particularly during pancreaticoduodenectomy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficiency of two commonly applied suture techniques (the interrupted versus the continuous suture technique) in patients undergoing a hepaticojejunostomy during pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: The HEKTIK trial is a multicenter, randomized controlled, patient-blinded surgical explorative trial with two parallel study groups. An adaptive sample size design was chosen: First, 100 patients scheduled for surgery including a hepaticojejunostomy will be randomized 1:1 either to the interrupted suture technique or the continuous suture technique after informed consent. Based on this data, needed sample size will be adjusted. The primary endpoint will be the occurrence of anastomotic leakage of hepaticojejunostomy, defined as bilirubin concentration in the drain fluid at least 3 times the serum bilirubin concentration on or after postoperative day 3 or as the need for radiologic or operative intervention resulting from biliary collections or bile peritonitis (according to the definition of ISGLS). Further perioperative parameters like other morbidities as well as duration and costs of the hepaticojejunostomy will be analyzed as secondary outcomes. DISCUSSION: Until now there are no randomized controlled comparative data of these two suture techniques for hepaticojejunostomy. The HEKTIK trial will investigate the yet unanswered question of whether the interrupted suture or the continuous suture technique has advantages performing a hepaticojejunostomy during pancreatoduodenectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00024395 . Registered on 01 February 2021.

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis After Biliary Diversion.

OBJECTIVES: Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis is a heterogeneous group of genetic disorders characterized by disrupted bile homeostasis. Patients with this disease typically present with cholestasis and pruritus early in life and often progress to end-stage liver disease. The clinical symptoms that patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis encounter are usually refractory to medical treatment. Although the effects of biliary diversion surgery on native liver survival are not exactly known, this procedure may provide a positive impact on pruritus and laboratory parameters in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis who underwent partial external biliary diversion between 2002 and 2020 at our center. Diagnosis of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis was made by clinical, biochemical, and histopathological characteristics as well as genetic testing. RESULTS: Nine patients were included in the study. Five patients required liver transplant during follow-up, with 4 having liver transplant as a result of endstage liver disease (median interval of 5 years). In 1 patient, partial external biliary diversion was performed 1.5 years after liver transplant for severe diarrhea, metabolic acidosis, and hepatic steatosis. Four patients did not require liver transplant during follow-up (median follow-up time of 7.6 years). Pruritus responded well to partial external biliary diversion in all patients. Among laboratory values evaluated 6 months after biliary diversion, only albumin showed significant improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Partial external biliary diversion had favorable results on long-term follow-up. This procedure can provide the relief of pruritus and delay the requirement for liver transplant in patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. In our view, partial external biliary diversion should be considered the first-line surgical management for patients with this disease.

How we acquire suturing skills for laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy.

Laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision and hepaticojejunostomy is a representative surgical procedure requiring laparoscopic suturing including needle driving and knot tying. Laparoscopic needle driving and knot tying is a highly technically demanding skill, especially in small infants and children. We developed a laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy simulator for training. This simulator was developed for a 1-year-old infant body size based on computed tomography data and reproduced a pneumoperitoneum condition based on 3D scanner data of the clinical situation. Surgeon in training (SITs) of our institution have to acquire practice of laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy using a simulator before performing clinical cases. Thirteen cases of choledochal cyst have been managed at our institution since the introduction of practice using this simulator in 2016. Six SITs performed 13 cases of laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision and hepaticojejunostomy. There were no cases of anastomotic bile leakage. Laparoscopic disease-specific simulator practice is effective for the acquisition of secure hepaticojejunostomy skills for the treatment of choledochal cysts in children as off-the-job training.

Role of the Intramural Vascular Network of the Extrahepatic Bile Duct for the Blood Circulation in the Recipient Extrahepatic Bile Duct Used for Duct-to-Duct-Biliary-Anastomosis in Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

A duct-to-duct-biliary-anastomosis is the preferred biliary reconstruction technique in liver transplantation; biliary complications remain the major concerns for the technique. We examined the significance of the intramural vascular network of the extrahepatic bile duct (EBD) and its relevant vessels. We microscopically examined the axial sections of the EBD with 5 mm intervals of 10 formalin-fixed deceased livers. The luminal-areas of the 3 and 9 o'clock arteries correlated significantly and positively with the distance from the bifurcation of the right and left hepatic ducts (the 3 o'clock artery, r = 0.42, p < 0.001; the 9 o'clock artery, r = 0.39, p < 0.001); the ratios of the numbers of the intramural vessels to the areas of the corresponding sections of the EBD significantly correlated positively with the distance from the bifurcation of the right and left hepatic ducts (total vessels, r = 0.78, p < 0.001; arterioles, r = 0.52, p < 0.001; venules, r = 0.45, p < 0.001). This study demonstrated that there is a significant locoregional distributional heterogeneity of the intramural vessels among the EBD. The hepatic arteries neighboring the EBD primarily supply the blood flow to the EBD; thus, when the broader isolation of the EBD from the neighboring arteries is necessary, this locoregional distributional heterogeneity of the intramural vessels may render the EBD likely to suffer ischemia of the anastomotic site.

Differences in Outcome and Comparison of Stress and Immune Status in Patients with Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones after Biliary Tract Surgery Choosing Three Procedures (ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE) for Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of choosing ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE for the treatment of patients with recurrent common bile duct stones after biliary tract surgery. METHOD: 115 patients with recurrent common bile duct stones after biliary surgery in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed and divided into three groups according to the procedure, 36 patients in the ERCP group, 38 patients in the OCBDE group, and 41 patients in the LCBDE group, and compared the efficacy, stress status, and immune status of the three groups. RESULT: The stone removal rates were 91.67%, 97.37%, and 97.56% in the ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE groups, respectively (P > 0.05). There were statistical differences between the ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE groups in terms of operative time, postoperative recovery time of exhaustion, recovery time of defecation, recovery time of feeding, and hospitalization time (P < 0.05). The postoperative complication rates were 8.33%, 10.53%, and 7.32% in the ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE groups, respectively (P > 0.05). The recurrence rates within 1 year after surgery were 2.78%, 7.89%, and 2.44% in the ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE groups, respectively (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: ERCP has short operative time, short hospital stay, and rapid postoperative recovery. LCBDE has mild trauma, and OCBDE has a wide range of application. Each of the three procedures has its own advantages and shortcomings, and the most appropriate procedure should be selected on the basis of comprehensive evaluation.

Biliary diversion in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Biliary diversion (BD) is indicated in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) with refractory pruritus. Three types-partial external biliary drainage (PEBD), partial internal biliary drainage (PIBD), and ileal exclusion (IE) are described, with no consensus about the relative efficacy of these procedures. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for publications on PFIC and BD. Improvement in pruritus, serum bile acid (BA), and need for liver transplantation (LT) were compared between the various BD procedures. RESULTS: 25 studies [424 children (PEBD-301, PIBD-93, IE-30)] were included. Pruritus resolved in 59.5% [PIBD:72% (95%CI 43-96%), PEBD:57% (95%CI 43-71%) and IE:48% (95%CI 14-82%)] cases. Significant overlap in confidence intervals indicated no significant differences. Absolute decrease in BA (AUROC-0.72) and bilirubin (AUROC-0.69) discriminated responders and non-responders. Eventually, 27% required LT: PIBD 10.7%, PEBD32%, IE 27%. The post-operative BA (AUROC-0.9) and bilirubin (AUROC-0.85) determined need for LT. Complications were commoner in PEBD than PIBD (38% vs 21.8%: p=0.02). CONCLUSION: 59.5% children have pruritus relief after BD and 27% need LT. PIBD has lower complications and LT requirement than PEBD. However, this requires cautious interpretation as the 2 groups differed in PFIC type and follow-up duration.

Clinical outcomes of hepato-pancreato-biliary surgical patients during COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome of hepato-pancreato-biliary patients who were operated upon during the pandemic under a safety protocol devised to minimise the risk of coronavirus disease-2019 infection in patients and staff during the perioperative period. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted at the Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary (HPB) Unit of Bahria International Hospital Orchard, Lahore, Pakistan, in February 2021, and comprised data of all patients who were discussed in the multidisciplinary meeting of the Unit between May 1 and December 31, 2020. The coronavirus disease-2019 screening protocol was a negative polymerase chain reaction test just before admission and a second negative test 24-48 hours pre-surgery. All patients had computed tomography scan of chest to rule out atypical pneumonia due to coronavirus disease-2019 infection. Surgery was deferred for positive patients for at least 2 weeks until their test was negative. Surgeries were carried out with full personal protective equipment. Further testing was carried out if clinically indicated. Data was collected of 30-day coronavirus disease-2019-related morbidity and mortality. Data was analysed using SPSS 20. RESULTS: Of the 44 patients, 29(65.9%) were males and 15(34.1%) were females. Overall, 32(72.7%) patients were aged >40 years, 8(18.2%) were aged 20-40 years and 4(9%) were aged <20 years. Of the total, 7(15.09%) patients were found to be positive for coronavirus disease-2019 during preoperative screening. Among them, 5(71.4%) had successful surgery post-recovery, 1(14.3%) died without surgery due to pulmonary complications related to coronavirus disease-2019 and 1(14.3%) patient was lost to follow-up. Among the 42(95.5%) patients who underwent any procedure, 2(4.7%) patients turned positive for coronavirus disease-2019 in the postoperative period. There was 1(2.4%) mortality in the 30-day post-operative period which was not related to coronavirus disease-2019. Complications were seen in 5(11.90%) patients. Three (9.3%) out of 32 staff members were found to be asymptomatic carriers. CONCLUSIONS: Hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgery could be safely carried out during coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic if strict safety protocols were followed.

Ambidextrous needle driving and knot tying helps perform secure laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy of choledochal cyst (with video).

Ieiri and colleagues report an ingenious technique for performing ambidextrous suturing in laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy for cases with small hepatic ducts. Surgeons who devote professional attention to minimally invasive surgery should take care to practice extensively with their non-dominant as well as dominant hand to improve the quality of laparoscopic surgery.

EUS-guided transhepatic biliary drainage: a large single-center U.S. experience.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy has been performed for many years with most published experience from outside the United States. The luminal access point can be from the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, or jejunum; biliary access can be either into the right or left intrahepatic system. Thus, we prefer the term EUS-guided transhepatic biliary drainage (ETBD). We describe what is believed to be the largest single-center U.S. experience of ETBD for management of benign and malignant biliary disease. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all ETBD conducted by 1 endoscopist between September 2014 and May 2021. RESULTS: Two hundred fifteen patients underwent attempted ETBD: 85 for benign disease and 130 for malignant disease. Ninety-two patients (43%) had surgically altered anatomy (SAA). In 94 patients previously endoscopic attempts failed. The approach was transesophageal in 9, transgastric in 188, transduodenal in 5, and transjejunal in 5 patients. In 1 patient a bilateral approach was used. Standard fully covered self-expandable stents of 4- to 10-cm lengths and 8- or 10-mm diameters were used. Technical success was 95.3% and clinical success was 87.25%. Forty patients (18.6%) experienced adverse events (13 mild, 21 moderate, and 6 severe according to the modified American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy lexicon). Mean follow-up was 257.31 ± 308.11 days for all patients (124.53 ± 229.86 days for benign disease and 457.27 ± 466.31 days for malignant disease). Seventy-four patients (34.4%) had died at the time of data collection (66 in the malignant cohort, 8 in the benign cohort). Of those with malignancy surviving >6 months, 17.4% required reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: ETBD is effective in the management of benign and malignant biliary obstruction for patients with SAA as well as native anatomy, with a modest adverse event rate.